Legal Minute India
Delhi High Court

M/S PACIFICA (INDIA) PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED v. M/S CNA EXPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.

Court
Delhi High Court
Case number
ARB.P. - 1367/2026
Date of judgment
4 November 2026
Petitioner / Appellant
M/S PACIFICA (INDIA) PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED
Respondent
M/S CNA EXPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.
CNR
DLHC010359932026
Download PDFView on court website
The PDF is the copy published on the court's website, unchanged. It is not a certified copy. The text below is extracted automatically and may contain errors; the PDF is the authoritative version.

ARB.P. 1367/2026 Page 1 of 2

$~10

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010359932026 + ARB.P. 1367/2026, I.A. 21201/2026, I.A. 21292/2026 M/S PACIFICA (INDIA) PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Prashant Mehta, Sr .

Advocate with Mr. Sanje ev

Kumar Sharma, Ms. Niharika

Tiwari, Mr. Anirudh Sharma,

Mr. Shakhyam Agrawal,

Advocates.

versus

M/S CNA EXPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.

.....Respondents

Through: Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Advocate

for R-1 and 2.

Mr. Vinit Trehan and Ms .

Bhumi Agarwal, Advocates for

Intervenor.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA

ORDER (ORAL)

% 04.11.2026

1. Learned Counsel for the Respondents submit that they are nominating their nominee Arbitrator, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Nandrajog, former Chief J ustice, Bombay High Court (Mob. No.

9818000130).

2. The Petitioner has already nominated Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, former Judge, Supreme Court of India as their nominee Arbitrator (Mob. No. 8800555332).

ARB.P. 1367/2026 Page 2 of 2

3. Both the Arbitrators shall appo int the Presiding Arbitrator within three weeks to adjudicate the disputes arising between the parties.

4. Mr. Vinit Trehan along with Ms. Bhumi Agarwal , learned Counsel appears for the Intervenor submits that he has filed an intervening application and tha t the said application is coming up on 06.11.2026.

5. This Court is of the opinion that the same can be filed before the learned Tribunal. He submits that he may be given the liberty to file the application. Needless to state that the liberty is always ther e to file the application for impleadment before the learned Tribunal who shall decide the same in accordance with law.

6. In view of the above, the present petition stands disposed of.

Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J

NOVEMBER 4, 2026/pa