Legal Minute India
Delhi High Court

HARJIT SINGH v. THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT DELHI) & ANR.

Court
Delhi High Court
Case number
CRL.M.C. - 6580/2026
Date of judgment
28 October 2026
Petitioner / Appellant
HARJIT SINGH
Respondent
THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT DELHI) & ANR.
CNR
DLHC010418662026
Download PDFView on court website
The PDF is the copy published on the court's website, unchanged. It is not a certified copy. The text below is extracted automatically and may contain errors; the PDF is the authoritative version.

CRL.M.C. 6580/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages $~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 28.10.2026 # CNR No. DLHC010418662026 + CRL.M.C. 6580/2026 HARJIT SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate with petitioner ( through video conferencing).

versus

THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with SI Priyanka.

Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate with R-2

in person.

CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

1. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 549/2023 of PS Moti Nagar for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has compromised the disputes with the petitioners.

2. State has no objection to this petition. Statements of parties have

CRL.M.C. 6580/2026 Page 2 of 2 pages already been recorded by the concerned Joint Registrar.

3. The respondent no.2 is present in court today and is identified by IO/SI Priyanka. I have spoken with respondent no.2 in Hindi and it is stated by her that she has compromised all disputes with the petitioners. Marriage between petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 stands already dissolved by way of decree of divorce. One female child was born from the wedlock of petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2, who is in the care and custody of respondent no.2. The respondent no.2 submits that she has received complete full and final settlement amount in lieu of her entire stridhan and maintenance. Respondent no.2 submits that now she does not wish to continue prosecution of petitioners.

4. Having spoken with respondent no.2, I am satisfied that it would be in the interest of justice not to push the parties through full dress trial.

5. Therefore, the petition is allowed FIR No. 549/2023 of PS Moti Nagar for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC as well as proceedings arising out of the same are quashed.

GIRISH KATHPALIA

(JUDGE)

OCTOBER 28, 2026/dr