KR LAND FACILITATOR AND AGGREGATORS LLP v. SANYA INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED

ARB.P. 1559/2026 Page 1 of 3

$~9

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010410442026 + ARB.P. 1559/2026 KR LAND FACILITATOR AND AGGREGATORS LLP .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Susshil Daga, Mrs. Gazal Ghai, Advs.

versus

SANYA INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED

.....Respondent

Through: None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA

JUDGMENT(ORAL)

% 30.10.2026

1. It is made out from the record that service is sufficient, however, none has appeared on behalf of the Respondent nor any reply has been filed.

2. Petitioner claims an amount of approximately Rs.1,39,00,000/-.

3. It is well settled that, while exercising jurisdiction under Section 11 of the Act, the scope of enquiry is confined to examining the prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement.

4. In the present case, there is no dispute with regard to the existence of a valid arbitration clause between the parties. In the

ARB.P. 1559/2026 Page 2 of 3

aforesaid circumstances, this Court finds no impediment in appointing a Sole Arbitrator.

5. Accordingly, Ms. Payal Chawla, Advocate (Mob. No.

9811777786) is appointed as a learned Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes arisen between the parties. The learned Sole Arbitrator shall enter upon the reference within three weeks from today.

6. The learned Sole Arbitrator w ill proceed to the arbitration proceedings subject to furnishing requisite disclosures as required under Section 12(2) of the Act within three weeks of entering reference.

7. The arbitration shall be carried under the rules and aegis of Delhi International A rbitration Centre (“DIAC”). The learned Arbitrator shall be entitled to fees as per the Schedule of Fees maintained by the DIAC.

8. It shall be open to the parties to raise all pleas, including, before the learned Sole Arbitrator including with respect to th e impleadment of parties, objection as to arbitrability and jurisdiction before the learned Sole Arbitrator, who shall consider the same in accordance with law.

9. It is clarified that the observations made herein are only for the purpose of deciding the pre sent petition under Section 11(6) of the Act. The learned Sole Arbitrator shall adjudicate the disputes

ARB.P. 1559/2026 Page 3 of 3

independently and on their own merits, uninfluenced by any observations contained in the present order.

10. The Registry is directed to send a receipt of t his order to Ms.

Payal Chawla, learned Arbitrator through all permissible modes including email.

11. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of in the above terms.

OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J

OCTOBER 30, 2026/at