HUKAM SINGH AND ORS v. STATE THROUGH SHO P S KAPASHERA AND ORS
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Case number
- CRL.M.C. - 3248/2026
- Date of judgment
- 12 October 2026
- Petitioner / Appellant
- HUKAM SINGH AND ORS
- Respondent
- STATE THROUGH SHO P S KAPASHERA AND ORS
- CNR
- DLHC010181402026
CRL.M.C. 3248/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages $~53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 12.10.2026 # CNR No. DLHC010181402026 + CRL.M.C. 3248/2026 HUKAM SINGH AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Mahesh Tholia, Advocate with petitioners in person
versus
STATE THROUGH SHO P S KAPASHERA AND ORS
.....Respondents
Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP for State with SI Arti Yadav Respondents no. 2 and 3 in person
CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
J U D G M E N T (ORAL)
1. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 278/2023 of PS Kapashera for offence under Section 323/341/34 IPC along with chargesheet filed under Section 354A/506/34 IPC on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no.2) and respondent no. 3 have compromised the disputes with the petitioners.
2. State has no objection to this petition. Statements of parties have already been recorded by the concerned Joint Registrar.
CRL.M.C. 3248/2026 Page 2 of 2 pages
3. The respondents no.2 and 3 are present in court today and are identified by IO/SI Arti Yadav. I have spoken with respondent no.2 and 3 in Hindi and it is stated by them that they have compromised all disputes with the petitioners. Respondent no.2 and 3 submit that now they do not wish to continue prosecution of petitioners.
4. Having spoken with respondents no.2 and 3, I am satisfied that it would be in the interest of justice not to push the parties through full dress trial.
5. Therefore, the petition is allowed case FIR No. 278/2023 of PS Kapashera for offence under Section 323/341/34 IPC along with chargesheet filed under Section 354A/506/34 IPC as well as proceedings arising out of the same are quashed.
GIRISH KATHPALIA
(JUDGE)
OCTOBER 12, 2026/as