Legal Minute India
Delhi High Court

MUKESH AND ORS v. THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANOTHER

Court
Delhi High Court
Case number
CRL.M.C. - 6353/2026
Date of judgment
9 October 2026
Petitioner / Appellant
MUKESH AND ORS
Respondent
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANOTHER
CNR
DLHC010403892026
Download PDFView on court website
The PDF is the copy published on the court's website, unchanged. It is not a certified copy. The text below is extracted automatically and may contain errors; the PDF is the authoritative version.

CRL.M.C. 6353/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages $~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 09.10.2026 # CNR No. DLHC010403892026 + CRL.M.C. 6353/2026 MUKESH AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Pankaj Tiwari, Advocate.

versus

THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANOTHER .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP for State with IO/SI Sanjay.

Mr. Shagun, Advocate for R -2 with

R-2.

CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

J U D G M E N T

2. State has no objection to this petition. Statements of pa rties have already been recorded by the concerned Joint Registrar.

(ORAL)

1. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 450/2024 of PS K. M. Pur for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has compromised the disputes with the petitioners.

CRL.M.C. 6353/2026 Page 2 of 2 pages

3. The respondent no.2 is present in court today and is identified by IO/SI Sanjay. I have spoken with respondent no.2 in Hindi and it is stated by her that she has compromised all dispute s with the petitioner s. Marriage between petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 stands already dissolved by way of decree of divorce. No child was born from wedlock of petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2. The respondent no.2 submits that she has received complete full and final settlement amount in lieu of her entire stridhan and maintenance. Respondent no.2 submits that now she does not wish to continue prosecution of petitioners.

4. Having spoken with respondent no.2, I am satisfied that it would be in the interest of justice not to push the parties through a full dress trial.

5. Therefore, the petition is allowed case FIR No. 450/2024 of PS K. M.

Pur for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC as well as proceedings arising out of the same are quashed.

GIRISH KATHPALIA

(JUDGE)

OCTOBER 9, 2026/ry