Legal Minute India
Delhi High Court

AADAR STAMBH TOWNSIHP PVT. LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA

Court
Delhi High Court
Case number
ARB.P. - 1628/2026
Date of judgment
13 October 2026
Petitioner / Appellant
AADAR STAMBH TOWNSIHP PVT. LTD.
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA
CNR
DLHC010428392026
Download PDFView on court website
The PDF is the copy published on the court's website, unchanged. It is not a certified copy. The text below is extracted automatically and may contain errors; the PDF is the authoritative version.

ARB.P. 1628/2026 Page 1 of 3

$~8

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010428392026 + ARB.P. 1628/2026 AADAR STAMBH TOWNSIHP PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rahul Malhotra and Ms .

Sneha Agarwal, Advocates.

versus

UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent

Through: Ms. Iram Majid , CGSC with

Mr. Mohd Suboor, Mr . Mohd

Saad Khan, Mr . Amaan

Siddiqui, Mr . Goutham M S,

Advocates with Ms . Rekha

Pandey (Sr . Clerk), Mr . Sujeet

Kumar (SSE/Works).

Mr. Sarthak Rana, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA

JUDGMENT(ORAL)

% 13.10.2026

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961 seeking appointment of a Sole Arbitrator for adjudication of disputes arising between the parties under Agreement dated 28.01.2019.

2. Both parties are id idem that the matter can be referred to Arbitration.

3. It is well settled that, while exercising jurisdiction under Section

ARB.P. 1628/2026 Page 2 of 3

11 of the Act, the scope of enquiry is confined to examining the prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement1.

4. In the present case, there is no dispute with regard to the existence of a valid arbitration clause between the parties.

5. Further, the parties are ad idem with respect to the reference of the disputes to arbitration. In the aforesaid circumstances , this Court finds no impediment in appointing a Sole Arbitrator.

6. Accordingly, Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Chandrasekharan Sudha, Former Judge, Delhi High Court (Mob. No. 9446045653) is appointed as a learned Sole Arbitrator to adj udicate the disputes arisen between the parties. The learned Sole Arbitrator shall enter upon the reference within three weeks from today.

7. The learned Sole Arbitrator will proceed to the arbitration proceedings subject to furnishing requisite disclosures as required under Section 12(2) of the Act within three weeks of entering reference.

8. The arbitration shall be carried under the rules and aegis of Delhi International Arbitration Centre (“DIAC”) . The learned Arbitrator shall be entitled to fees as per the Schedule of Fees maintained by the DIAC.

1 SBI General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Krish Spinning 2024 SCC OnLine SC 1754

ARB.P. 1628/2026 Page 3 of 3

9. It shall be open to the parties to raise all pleas, including objection as to arbitrability and jurisdiction, before the learned Sole Arbitrator who shall decide the same in accordance with law.

10. It is clarified t hat the observations made herein are only for the purpose of deciding the present petition under Section 11(6) of the Act. The learned Sole Arbitrator shall adjudicate the disputes independently and on their own merits, uninfluenced by any observations contained in the present order.

11. The Registry is directed to send a receipt of this order to Mrs.

Chandrasekharan Sudha, learned Arbitrator through all permissible modes including email.

12. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of in the above terms.

OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J

OCTOBER 13, 2026/pa