Supreme Court of India

STATE OF ASSAM v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS

Supreme Court refers Assam-Nagaland boundary dispute to mediation, appoints two co-mediators

The Court dismissed an interlocutory application seeking modification of its earlier order. It appointed two senior advocates as co-mediators to attempt resolution of the Assam-Nagaland boundary dispute alongside the Local Commission, with the report due by 6 December 2010.

Why it matters: The Court directed mediation of an Article 131 inter-State boundary dispute while the Local Commission proceedings continue in parallel.

Summary written with AI and checked against the judgment text. It is not part of the judgment; read the full text or PDF.

Headnote

Constitution of India, 1950: Article 131 - Boundary dispute between States of Assam C and Nagaland - Suit - Interlocutory application - HELD: Apart from the proceedings before the Local Commission appointed earlier by Supreme Court, an attempt should also be made to resolve the dispute between the two of the foremost experts in D mediation in India, appointed to be the Co-mediators - They may also take the help of experts and may also have one assistant each for the process of mediation - Guidelines given as regards the sittings for mediation and the procedure to be followed - It is

Headnote as published with the judgment in the Supreme Court Reports dataset; it is not part of the judgment.

Court: Supreme Court of India
Case number: ORIGINAL SUIT No. 2/1988
Date of judgment: 20 August 2010
Petitioner / Appellant: STATE OF ASSAM
Respondent: UNION OF INDIA & ORS
Neutral citation: 2010 INSC 538
SCR citation: [2010] 10 S.C.R. 500
Bench: MARKANDEY KATJU, T.S. THAKUR
CNR: ESCR010000412010
Result: Referred

Download PDF Find it on the Supreme Court SCR site Get the signed copy

Signed copy from the Supreme Court. On the court's Judgments page, open the Case Number tab, choose the case type Original Suit, enter the case number 2 and the year 1988, solve the captcha, and open the PDF in the Judgment column. Or use the Judgment Date tab with 20-08-2010 as both dates. The court's page asks for a captcha, so this step is yours.

This is the Supreme Court Reports (SCR) copy, with citation and headnotes, obtained through the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open dataset (CC-BY-4.0, Dattam Labs) and unchanged. To find it on the Supreme Court's own SCR site (scr.sci.gov.in), enter the neutral citation 2010 INSC 538 in its Neutral Citation field. It is not the plain signed judgment and not a certified copy; for a certified copy use the Certified Copy service on sci.gov.in. The text below is extracted automatically and may contain errors, and the result label is read from the closing lines of the judgment, so it can occasionally be wrong. The PDF is the authoritative version.

[2010] 10 S.C.R. 500

STATE OF ASSAM

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

(Original Suit No. 2 of 1988)

AUGUST 20, 2010

(MARKANDEY KAT JU AND T.S. THAKUR, JJ.]

Constitution of India, 1950:

Article 131 - Boundary dispute between States of Assam C and Nagaland - Suit - Interlocutory application - HELD:

Apart from the proceedings before the Local Commission appointed earlier by Supreme Court, an attempt should also be made to resolve the dispute between the two States by mediation - Accordingly, two of the foremost experts in D mediation in India, appointed to be the Co-mediators - They may also take the help of experts and may also have one assistant each for the process of mediation - Guidelines given as regards the sittings for mediation and the procedure to be followed - It is to be ensured that the report of the mediators E reaches the Court by 6.12.2010 - It is made clear that this process will not in any way affect the proceedings before the Local Commission where the State of Nagaland will file its evidence preferably within two months and co-operate with the Local Commission to enable it to complete its assignment as F early as possible - Alternative Disputes Resolution by mediation.

CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION : Original Suit No. 2 of 1988.

G Krishnan Venugopal, Krishna Sarma, Navneet Kumar, Vartika Sahay (for Corporate Law Group) for the Appellant.

Mohan Jain, ASG, K.N. Balgopal, Kailash Vasdev, D.K.

Thakur (for P. Parmeswaran), Gopal Singh, A.P. Mukundan, Edward Belho, Timikha Koza, P.A.R. Naga, G.K. Bhart, Sanjay H 500 STATE OF ASSAM v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 501 Sandilya, Anil Srivastav, Meenakshi Arora, Mohit D. Ram, A Kumar Mihir, Sanjeev Kumar (for Khaitan & Co.) A.S. Bhasme, Sanjeev Kumar for the Respondents.

The following order of the Court was delivered ORDER B Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The Interlocutory Application No.19 of 2010 in orginal Suit No.2 of 1988 (for modification of the order dated 12th January, 2010) is dismissed. c As regards the Original Suit No.2of1988 under Article 131 of the Constitution of India filed by the State of Assam against the State of Negaland, we are of the opinion that apart from the proceedings before the Local Commission appointed earlier by this Court, an attempt should also be made to resolve D the dispute between the State of Assam and State of Negaland by mediation.

The present dispute is for determining the boundary betwee the State of Assam and State of Nagaland. The State of Nagaland was created by an Act of Parliament of 1962 out of the territories of Assam, but the exact boundary between the two States is yet to be determined.

We, therefore, appoint Mr. Sriram Panchoo, Senior Advocate, High Court of Madras at Chennai and Mr. Niranjan Bhat, Senior Advocate High Court of Gujarat at Ahmdabad, who are two of the foremost experts in mediation in India, to be the co-mediators. They may also take the help of experts E F and may also have one assistant each for the process of mediation. The two mediators will decide who the expert should G be in the mediation and the representative of the Union Home Ministry shall also be associated with the process of mediation.

The two mediators may fix their own emoluments and expenses and also of their assistants, which shall be borne equally by the two States. H 502 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2010) 10 S.C.R.

A We are of the opinion that the two mediatiors and their assistants will first have three sittings with the Chief Secretaries of Assam and Negaland and other officers whom the Chief Secretaries may like to associated with them. After these three sittings, a preliminary Report will be submitted by the two B meditors regarding the progres,s made and whether in their opinion it is possible to resolve the dispute between the parties by mediation. This case will be listed after the receipt of the preliminary Report from the two mediators. If a positive report is received, we may consider extending the period for C mediation with the consent of the parties. The first meeting of the mediators and their assistants with the Chief Secretaries and other officers whom the Cheif Secretaries may like to associate with them will be held on Saturday and Sunday, 18th and 19th September, 2010 at New Delhi at a place determined D by the Union Home Ministry. The Union Home Ministry will arrange for the air~ickets, accommodation, transport etc. of the two meditors and their assistance. The other two dates and the venue will be fixed by the two meditors in consultation with the Chief Secretaries of the two States concerned but the second meeting should not be four weeks later than the first meeting E and the third meeting should not be four weeks later than the second metting to ensure that the report of the mediators reaches this Court by 06th December, 2010.

List this case on 13th December, 2010.

F We make it clear that this process will not in any way affect the proceedings before the Local Commission where the State of Nagaland will filed its evidence preferably within two months from today and co-opertate with the Local Commission to enable the Commission to complete its assignment as early G as possible.

Let a copy of this order be sent forthwith to the two mediators appointed by us, Chief Secretaries of the Two States and Union Home MinistrY.

H R.P. Matter adjourned.