Legal Minute India

Log in

We email you a 6-digit code. No password to remember.

By logging in you accept the terms of use and privacy notice.

Top StoriesArticlesActsSectionsAdvocatesE-filingLitigants
LEGAL MINUTE INDIAEvery Supreme Court & High Court judgment, in plain language
Daily articlesEnglish & HindiFull judgment PDFs
Supreme Court of India

RAJESH RANJAN @ PAPPU YADAV v. STATE OF BIHAR THR. CBI

Headnote

C Review: Petition seeking review of the order of Supreme Court whereby it set aside the order of High Court granting bail to review petitioner - Application for exemption from 0 surrendering also filed - HELD: It is surprising to note that despite the accused by the Court, neither the accused has surren.dered nor he has been taken into custody - There is no merit in the review petition as also the application for exemption from surrendering and they are E dismissed accordingly - CBI and Director General of Police, Bihar directed to execute

Headnote as published with the judgment in the Supreme Court Reports dataset; it is not part of the judgment.
Court
Supreme Court of India
Case number
REVIEW PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 352/2010
Date of judgment
5 August 2010
Petitioner / Appellant
RAJESH RANJAN @ PAPPU YADAV
Respondent
STATE OF BIHAR THR. CBI
Neutral citation
2010 INSC 483
SCR citation
[2010] 9 S.C.R. 690
Bench
MARKANDEY KATJU, A.K. PATNAIK
CNR
ESCR010008682010
Result
Dismissed
Download PDFFind it on the Supreme Court SCR siteGet the signed copy

Signed copy from the Supreme Court. On the court's Judgments page, open the Case Number tab, choose the case type Review Petition (Criminal), enter the case number 352 and the year 2010, solve the captcha, and open the PDF in the Judgment column. Or use the Judgment Date tab with 05-08-2010 as both dates. The court's page asks for a captcha, so this step is yours.

This is the Supreme Court Reports (SCR) copy, with citation and headnotes, obtained through the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open dataset (CC-BY-4.0, Dattam Labs) and unchanged. To find it on the Supreme Court's own SCR site (scr.sci.gov.in), enter the neutral citation 2010 INSC 483 in its Neutral Citation field. It is not the plain signed judgment and not a certified copy; for a certified copy use the Certified Copy service on sci.gov.in. The text below is extracted automatically and may contain errors, and the result label is read from the closing lines of the judgment, so it can occasionally be wrong. The PDF is the authoritative version.

[2010] 9 S.C.R. 690

A RAJESH RANJAN @ PAPPU YADAV

v.

STATE OF BIHAR THR. CBI

Review Petition (Criminal) No. 352 of 2010 In B (Criminal Appeal No. 960 of 2010)

AUGUST 5, 2010

[MARKANDEY KAT JU AND A.K. PATNAfK, JJ.]

C Review:

Petition seeking review of the order of Supreme Court whereby it set aside the order of High Court granting bail to review petitioner - Application for exemption from 0 surrendering also filed - HELD: It is surprising to note that despite cancellation of bail of the accused by the Court, neither the accused has surren.dered nor he has been taken into custody - There is no merit in the review petition as also the application for exemption from surrendering and they are E dismissed accordingly - CBI and Director General of Police, Bihar directed to execute the order of the Court dated May 3, 2010 forthwith and send a compliance report to the Court - Bail - Cancellation of CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Review Petition F (Crl.} No. 352 of 2010.

IN

Criminal Appeal No. 960 of 2010.

G Against the Order dated 03.05.2010 passed by this Hon'ble Court in Crl. A.No. 960 of 2010.

Prem Prakash for the Petitioner.

H 690

RAJESH RANJAN @ PAPPU YADAV v. STATE OF 691 BIHAR THR. CBI The following order of the Court was delivered ORDER This Review Petition has been filed seeking review of this Court's order dated May 03, 2010, whereby we have set aside A the impugned judgment and order dated 18.02.2009 granting B bail to the petitioner herein. It was directed that the petitioner­ accused Rajesh Ranjan alias Pappu Yadav be taken into custody forthwith.

An application for exemption from surrendering has also c been filed with this review petition. We are surprised to note that despite cancellation of bail of the accused by this Court, neither the accused has surrendered nor he has been taken into custody.

We have carefully gone through the review petition and the D connected papers as also the application for exemption from surrendering. We do not find any merit therein and they are dismissed accordingly.

The CBI and Director General of Police, Bihar are directed E to execute the order of this Court dated May 03, 2010 forthwith and send a compliance report to this Court within four weeks from today.

R.P. Review Petition dismissed.